What it does
Irrigation Layout Designer is an interactive screening workspace for a rectangular drip-irrigation block. It draws a scaled SVG schematic and estimates simultaneous flow, mainline and submain velocity, Hazen–Williams head loss, pressure margin and a simple pressure-variation-based uniformity indicator.
The calculator simplifies emitter behaviour, lateral losses, fittings, transients and terrain. Confirm a final layout with field measurements, manufacturer data and a qualified irrigation engineer.
Before you start
- Measure the block length, width, row orientation and representative slopes.
- Gather pump pressure and flow rating, filter loss, pipe diameters and emitter specifications.
- Decide whether the scenario assumes a ring main, two-side-fed submains or pressure-compensating emitters.
- Treat all displayed values as one comparative scenario, not a construction specification.
Quick workflow
- In Field & Terrain, enter dimensions, orientation and slopes.
- In Headworks & Constraints, set pump pressure, maximum flow, filter loss, fertigation, allowable pressure variation and maximum velocity.
- Configure Mainline, Submains and Drip laterals.
- Review Layout preview, Hydraulic summary and Constraint checks as values update.
- Select Export SVG to save the current schematic.
- Select Reset or Reset defaults to restore the initial scenario.
Controls & outputs
| Group | Inputs or outputs |
|---|---|
| Field & Terrain | Length, width, clockwise orientation from north, lengthwise slope and cross-field slope. |
| Headworks & Constraints | Pump pressure, pump flow rating, filter loss, fixed 5 kPa fertigation loss toggle, allowable ΔP and velocity limit. |
| Mainline | Diameter, hydraulic length, PE (C≈140) or PVC (C≈150), edge or centreline display, and ring/two-end feed. |
| Submains | Spacing, diameter, two-side feed and a Valve every (runs) planning value. |
| Drip laterals | Tape spacing, emitter spacing, emitter flow, operating pressure, tape length and pressure-compensating label. |
| Layout preview | Scaled SVG schematic with headworks, mainline, submains and laterals. |
| Hydraulic summary | Total laterals, system flow, main/submain velocities and head losses, available pressure, pump pressure and estimated CU. |
| Constraint checks | Warnings for mainline velocity, pump flow, non-positive post-main pressure, negative lateral pressure margin and large slope head differences. |
Valve every (runs) and the pressure-compensating toggle are recorded in the scenario but do not currently change the geometry or hydraulic equations.
How it works
Layout and demand
- Submain and lateral counts are derived with floor-based spacing rules and a minimum of one run.
- Emitters per tape are estimated from configured tape length and emitter spacing.
- System flow assumes every derived tape operates at the same time and every emitter supplies the entered nominal flow.
- Orientation rotates the local SVG geometry; it does not georeference the drawing.
Hydraulic estimate
Mainline and submain friction use:
hf = 10.67 × L × Q^1.852 / (C^1.852 × d^4.87)
v = Q / (π × d² / 4)
The mainline uses the selected material coefficient. The submain uses C=140. Ring feed halves effective mainline length and flow; two-side feed halves effective submain length and flow.
Available lateral pressure subtracts filter loss, the optional 5 kPa fertigation loss, mainline loss, submain loss and positive lengthwise slope head from pump pressure. Cross-field slope is reported as a warning but is not deducted from the displayed available pressure.
The displayed CU is a bounded heuristic:
estimated CU = clamp(100 − 1.6 × allowable ΔP, 60, 98)
It is not calculated from simulated emitter discharge measurements.
Data, privacy & external services
All inputs, calculations and SVG generation run locally in the browser. The app does not upload the design or call a hydraulic service. Settings last only for the current page session unless the SVG is exported.
Limitations
- Lateral friction, local fittings, valves, filter curves, elevation profiles, pressure transients and water hammer are not modelled.
- Nominal emitter flow is not adjusted through a pressure–discharge curve.
- The cross-field slope, valve frequency and pressure-compensating toggle do not alter the pressure calculation.
- Only mainline velocity is compared with the entered velocity limit.
- Tape length affects demand and lengthwise slope, while laterals in the schematic span the displayed field block.
- The SVG has no geographic coordinates and should not be treated as CAD, GIS or an installation drawing.
Troubleshooting
| Problem | What to check |
|---|---|
| System flow exceeds the pump rating | Reduce simultaneous laterals or emitter flow, or evaluate zoning and a different pump scenario. |
| Pressure margin is negative | Increase available pressure, reduce losses, upsize pipes, shorten runs or compare ring/two-side feed. |
| Mainline velocity warning appears | Increase mainline diameter or reduce simultaneous flow. |
| The CU value seems unexpected | It is derived only from Allowable ΔP (%) and is not a network simulation. |
| The drawing is clipped after rotation | Try a smaller orientation angle for inspection; the export uses the same fixed SVG canvas. |
| SVG does not download | Allow browser downloads and try Export SVG again. |